Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Zephaniah E, Hull wrote:
> All in all I think I much prefer this approach over rewriting the DFSG..
>
> For all the little flaws, the current DFSG is known, tested, and
> accepted.
> Minor changes to correct flaws and patch holes are fine, but a complete
> rewrite of a accepted standard? Is this /REALLY/ what we want to do?
>
> Zephaniah E, Hull.
<aol>me too!</aol> ;)
--
Robert S. Edmonds
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Debian developer | http://www.debian.org |
| Freshmeat staff member | http://freshmeat.net |
| NetWinder developer | http://www.netwinder.org |
| stu@novare.net | http://www.stu.ddns.org |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
Reply to: