Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4

["James R. Van Zandt" <jrv@vanzandt.mv.com>]

Robert Edmonds <stu@novare.net> writes:
>On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Zephaniah E, Hull wrote:
>
>> All in all I think I much prefer this approach over rewriting the DFSG..
>> 
>> For all the little flaws, the current DFSG is known, tested, and
>> accepted.  Minor changes to correct flaws and patch holes are fine,
>> but a complete rewrite of a accepted standard? Is this /REALLY/
>> what we want to do?
>> 
>> Zephaniah E, Hull.
>
><aol>me too!</aol>    ;)

I agree.

		- Jim Van Zandt