Re: Package maintainer script policy.

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> 	Yes, it does say script. However, unless there are cogent
>  reasons for forbidding something, should we not opt for a less
>  draconian solution?

Ah, I've not been arguing the general case because we only have
this one example.  [The original question was whether or not it
would be appropriate to file a bug report against this package.
I felt a wishlist bug report would be appropriate and have been
defending that belief.]

> 	How many people actually understand what ${1+"$@"} does, really?

Interesting question.  I thought it meant exactly the same thing
as "$@".  Why?

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org