Re: Should xisp conflict with diald?
>> "RM" == Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:
Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> wrote:
MB> I am not familiar with diald, but I think it creates a default route on a
MB> dummy device. Now pppd (called by xisp) can't setup a default route just
MB> like it would be the case, if you had installed a default route over a
MB> NIC.
RM> If you wanted to bypass diald, you could set up a default route with
RM> a higher priority (metric of 0).
Hmm, that should work, thanks. The defaultroute used by diald should have
metric 1, then pppd will create a defaultroute with higher metric.
I will ask the submitter to try this out.
RM> But I don't understand enough about the situation to understand why
RM> diald isn't working.
Oh, diald works well, but xisp tries to set the defaultroute using the
"defaultroute" pppd parameter and pppd fails for obvious reasons.
Ciao,
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: