Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again

To: Scott Hanson <shanson@shcon.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 19:40:16 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980703194016.B786@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Scott Hanson <shanson@shcon.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 871zs2tw5s.fsf@kirby.shcon.com>; from Scott Hanson on Sat, Jul 04, 1998 at 12:19:27AM +0200
References: <[🔎] 593864.3108489668@195.82.102.207> <[🔎] 871zs2tw5s.fsf@kirby.shcon.com>

Scott Hanson <shanson@shcon.com> wrote:
> > Well, the answer to this particular problem, IMO, is to simply only
> > include those packages which are unambiguously distributable (e.g.
> > mysql, qt).

Note that until the kde license gets sorted out, kde (which is GPL'd and
is currently in contrib) has distribution restrictions when combined
with qt (which is currently the only way to build binaries, which is
the reason kde is in contrib in the first place).

-- 
Raul

--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>

References:
- Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
  - From: "Jules Bean" <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
  - From: Scott Hanson <shanson@shcon.com>

Prev by Date: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Next by Date: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
Next by thread: Re: non-free and "cd-ok", again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread