Re: /usr/bin -> /bin changes
On Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 10:01:19AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980701201421.2000A-100000@cantor.unex.es> you wrote:
> > Really: If a package breaks without these symlinks being present in
> > Debian, then the package is already broken by Linux standards. Do we have
> > to support broken software? I think we don't have.
>
> Who's talking about packages? It's the locally installed software that needs
> these symlinks. So please put them back.
Surely they can be put back locally too, then?
That seems appropriate to me.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: