Re: /usr/bin -> /bin changes
In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980701201421.2000A-100000@cantor.unex.es> you wrote:
> Really: If a package breaks without these symlinks being present in
> Debian, then the package is already broken by Linux standards. Do we have
> to support broken software? I think we don't have.
Who's talking about packages? It's the locally installed software that needs
these symlinks. So please put them back.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.0beta is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: