Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Jim <jim@laney.edu> wrote:
> Are you unhappy with the result (hamm)? I'm not...

I'm not unhappy with hamm, but I am unhappy that we didn't have any
releases between bo and hamm. 

Mind you, I've come up with workarounds, but I also had some service
outages that could have been avoided if I could have kept a clean
distinction between production use and hamm unstable.

Also, I have one machine still running bo with a hand-built copy of
perl 5.004 (which was installed before bo-upgrades existed).  I'm
going to have to burn a weekend bringing that back on track with
hamm without losing anything essential...


-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org