Re: crypt++.el nonus or main

To: pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu
Cc: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>, "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>, Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 05 Apr 1998 00:57:39 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 8767kohi1o.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Ben Pfaff's message of "04 Apr 1998 10:46:59 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 13603.37630.699665.942434@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] 19980402160749.10412@kuolema> <[🔎] 13603.42383.617041.837056@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] 19980402204331.00472@kuolema> <[🔎] 87pvj0ggwm.fsf@hastur.rlyeh.net> <[🔎] 19980402213314.24994@kuolema> <[🔎] 871zvfoyy7.fsf@hal.olympus.fake> <[🔎] 87afa283sg.fsf@wsuse5.mckesson.com> <[🔎] 87yaxl1te4.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>

Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> writes:

> Yes, all emacsen-related packages should depend on emacsen-common.  If
> mailcrypt doesn't, that's a bug.

Acutally, I believe they should depend on emacsen, unless they need a
particular emacs flavor, then they should depend on those flavors
directly.  No package should be depending on emacsen-common except the
various emacsen binary packages.

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94  53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>

References:
- crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: META: Can we please restrict the list?
Next by Date: Intent to package: Gambit-C and MIT-Scsh
Previous by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Next by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread