Re: crypt++.el nonus or main

To: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>
Cc: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
Date: 03 Apr 1998 23:05:51 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87afa283sg.fsf@wsuse5.mckesson.com>
In-reply-to: "Davide G. M. Salvetti"'s message of "03 Apr 1998 14:46:08 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 13603.37630.699665.942434@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] 19980402160749.10412@kuolema> <[🔎] 13603.42383.617041.837056@evinrude.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <[🔎] 19980402204331.00472@kuolema> <[🔎] 87pvj0ggwm.fsf@hastur.rlyeh.net> <[🔎] 19980402213314.24994@kuolema> <[🔎] 871zvfoyy7.fsf@hal.olympus.fake>

>>>>> "DGMS" == Davide G M Salvetti <salve@debian.org> writes:
    DGMS> Mailcrypt went not to main just because it _depends_ on pgp.

Which reminds me: would you like a bug against mailcrypt due to it's
insistence on emacs (I'm an xemacs user).  Or should there be some
virtual emacs that {x,}emacs{19,20} provide & that you depend on?
Or maybe all third party emacsen packages should depend on emacsen-common?

-- 
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>

References:
- crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
  - From: "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: APT broken ?
Next by Date: Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
Previous by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Next by thread: Re: crypt++.el nonus or main
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread