Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5.1)
>From the proposed constitution (v0.5):
9. Software in the Public Interest
SPI and Debian are separate organisations who share some goals. Debian
is grateful for the legal support framework offered by SPI. Debian's
^^^^^^^^
developers are currently members of SPI by virtue of their status as
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
developers.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Is SPI a membership organization? If not, the last sentence above makes no
sense. If so, how can Debian decide who gets to be a member? I think that
sentence should be deleted. If it is desired that Debian developers be SPI
members a statement to that effect belongs in SPI's bylaws, not in Debian's
constitution.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: