Re: Constitution - formal proposal (v0.5)
This is mostly a grammatical post but other stuff as well.
1. Introduction --> "who have made common cause", this reads odd.
2.1 point 1 "A person who does not want to do perform a task", the do
seems superfluous
3.1 Powers seems to allow a developer to ignore Debian policy
It seems that the Leader can prevent people from joining the technical
commitee and thus allow only people who are in his "camp" a voice there
8.1 point 2 what does vetting mean???
And it has been mentioned before but.... When you say a 2:1 majority
are we speaking of ALL developers and those able to vote or just those
who voted? Or is the default a NULL vote, and this is changed as people
vote??
--
-----------------------------------------------
How can you see, when your mind is not open?
How can you think, when your eyes are closed?
- Jason Bonham Band, "Ordinary Black and White"
-----------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: