[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Summary of Package Overlaps



On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> 
> > On 5 Feb 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
> > 
> > > dark@xs4all.nl (Richard Braakman) writes:
> > > 
> > > > We're now up to 30 overlaps, partly due to the presence of libc5-dev
> > > > in hamm
> > > 
> > > There should be no libc5-dev in hamm.  Dale wanted to use the
> > > identical source for hamm and bo-updates, but that doesn't work very
> > > well.
> >
> > Can you 'splain? The current libc5-dev works fine on bo systems and is
> > replaced properly by libc6-dev on a hamm machine, so where is the problem?
> 
> I think the problem is that there should be no libc5-dev *in hamm*.
> We have already libc5-altdev...

The libc5-dev in hamm has a very specific purpose, to provide a
libc5-dev/libc5 combo that can coexist with libc6 for those people who
don't want to upgrade their entire compilation environment.  Unfortuantly
the version created and updated is missing the "Conflicts/Provides:
libc-dev" that is standard for libc-dev packages.  When that is added, the
package should coexist fine.

-- 
Scott K. Ellis <storm@gate.net>                 http://www.gate.net/~storm/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: