Re: Summary of Package Overlaps
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On 5 Feb 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
>
> > dark@xs4all.nl (Richard Braakman) writes:
> >
> > > We're now up to 30 overlaps, partly due to the presence of libc5-dev
> > > in hamm
> >
> > There should be no libc5-dev in hamm. Dale wanted to use the
> > identical source for hamm and bo-updates, but that doesn't work very
> > well.
>
> Can you 'splain? The current libc5-dev works fine on bo systems and is
> replaced properly by libc6-dev on a hamm machine, so where is the problem?
I think the problem is that there should be no libc5-dev *in hamm*.
We have already libc5-altdev...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNNsv0iqK7IlOjMLFAQFGtgP/bZjgC1fBmLW6eWqsCws+3w6RMRveXTQ5
fsAH1gMqEqElSoampAytg3uRybrIn4HhjBxIng7Gd6t/QugVtpvUw8T6HyGZmoLA
t/P7ieO9cvZaQ8DD8cM6y+VFj8zixow9b4W/CL/PX8TFqxijSqqhx8aGGPnDopcV
cHEou2eR4Uw=
=3UL5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: