Re: Debian violates GPL?
John Goerzen <email@example.com> writes:
> CVS is poor for archiving binaries. For compressed files,
> especially, it is no better than having all old versions around.
I wasn't proposing archiving any binaries.
> Furtermore, you'd need to distribute all the ,v files on the mirrors
> so that people not working from master could get older versions.
> Mirrors would have to have cvs servers running for those that need
> older versions.
I wasn't proposing that the CVS server necessarily be open to
anonymous access. I was proposing it as a way to make sure we can
satisfy the "source availablity clause" on demand.
Rob Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930