[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

a few q's



Hello,

I was browsing through bug list for virtual package
'general', and have questions and suggestions about
some.

Can someone explain to me are issues raised in bug
#25847 still there? I don't have any recently updated
slink/potato around and can't check myself. Some
of the things are certainly interesting, like ownerships
on several directories and log files.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/25/25847.html).

Can someone who speaks German (Deutsch) translate
exactly what does bug #20734 say? From what
I can understand, it's the same problem as with
bug #20170 - wrong paths.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/20/20734.html and
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/28/28170.html)

Bugs #29387 and #29429 are related with virtual package
'ftp.debian.org' and should be reassigned - and then
closed since the archive, and the Packages files, have
been updated since (?).
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/29/29387.html and
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/29/29429.html)

I don't know the official Debian umask mode, but I've
noticed the 002 somewhere in /etc when I installed
first time. Although programs that create files should
set perms themselves, IMHO that should be 022.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/29/29338.html)

The problems in bug #26937 are probably caused
by some packages that require the old x* packages
version, or maybe by a bug in dselect. I'll contact
the submitter to ask him if he can reproduce it.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/26/26937.html)

Hamm was never released for sparc arch, right?
But sparc has probably gone several lightyears
since submittal of bug #23632, and already has
got working X packages, so this bug should be
closed.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/23/23632.html)

Can someone explain the purpose of /etc/.pwd.lock
file (or point me to TFM), and what is wrong with it
(reffering to bug #25846, at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/25/25846.html)?

Bug #28232 should be closed but inevitably other
'bug' reports like that one will be pouring after
slink release :(
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/28/28232.html)

The bug #29453 doesn't really exist - user just
needs to install the qt .deb package. If nobody
replied to him (how to find that out?) I will.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/29/29453.html)

Bug #28442 should be reassigned to package
xserver-common. And probably closed, since
-5 was one of the 'unstable' releases of X packages.
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/28/28442.html)

That's about it... if you've gotten this far, go to sleep :)


--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/


Reply to: