Re: Debian security (was Re: Nomination question: Redhat)

[Enrique Zanardi <ezanardi@ull.es>]

Milan Zamazal <mz@pdm.pvt.net> writes:
> 
> When it was mentioned -- some people in our country think RedHat is more
> secure than Debian.  When I asked them why, I received two non-religious
> answers.  One was that Debian is not much visible in "security places"
> (like security-audit, etc.), which makes an impression Debian people are
> not much interested in security.  The second was that Debian doesn't
> support PAM, which lowers overall security abilities of the system.

Talking about security, Alan Cox talked recently in bugtraq about 
security holes fixed in kernel 2.0.36. Does that justify inclusion of
2.0.36 in slink?

--
Enrique Zanardi					   ezanardi@ull.es