Debian security (was Re: Nomination question: Redhat)
>>>>> "JT" == James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:
JT> In general Redhat respond faster than us to most security
JT> incidents and Redhat have Alan Cox auditing code. We don't.
When it was mentioned -- some people in our country think RedHat is more
secure than Debian. When I asked them why, I received two non-religious
answers. One was that Debian is not much visible in "security places"
(like security-audit, etc.), which makes an impression Debian people are
not much interested in security. The second was that Debian doesn't
support PAM, which lowers overall security abilities of the system.
Milan Zamazal
Reply to: