Re: Nomination question: Redhat
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 1998 at 05:47:05PM -0600, David Welton wrote:
> > > The way your argument looks to me is "they have Alan Cox and we
> > > don't so they must have a better security tean." So they have Alan
> > > Cox working for them, I don't consider this a big deal.
> >
> > From what I have understood, the people involved in the 'linux
> > security audit' or whatever it is, are mostly working with redhat.
>
> I think perhaps this is something we should be working to rectify
> rather than arguing "But they have <insert ubercoder here>!"
I'm pointing out the deficiencies in Debian's security for no other
reason than because you chose to flame Redhat about their security in
a public forum.
> > He's on a pretty close level to Linus, and has done a lot for linux
> > (big understatement).
>
> Does that make Redhat better than everyone else? I don't think so.
Did anyone say that? No. Once again, please respond to what people
actually write, it's much easier to carry on a discussion that way.
--
James
Reply to: