[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gdb is broken?

J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> In the current egcs packages, several patches are applied at build time
> (rather than in the .diff.gz already); this should be doable for gdb too.
> The threads patch could then only be applied on the architectures which it
> supports. This to me seems the best solution: i386 has threads support, and
> non-i386 works as before.

Lame question but why not use defines such as __i386__, __m68k__
etc. like it is done with libraries or so?



No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.

Reply to: