Re: gdb is broken?

[Martin Schulze <joey@tapiola.Infodrom.North.DE>]

J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> In the current egcs packages, several patches are applied at build time
> (rather than in the .diff.gz already); this should be doable for gdb too.
> The threads patch could then only be applied on the architectures which it
> supports. This to me seems the best solution: i386 has threads support, and
> non-i386 works as before.

Lame question but why not use defines such as __i386__, __m68k__
etc. like it is done with libraries or so?

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Please always Cc to me when answering on the lists.