Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4
On 03-Dec-98, 13:12 (CST), Ian Jackson <email@example.com> wrote:
> Milan Zamazal writes ("Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4"):
> > When I was going to move SWI Prolog from non-free to main, I asked about
> > its license on debian-devel and the conclusion was it's DFSG free.
> I think that it might be reasonable to add an exception for such `must
> credit' licences.
How is this significantly different than the advertising clause? One
says "If you base your software on my software, you must credit me".
The other says "If you use my software for publicized work, you must