Re: Draft new DFSG - r1.4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
We have a kinda lenghthy process in the constitution... ;)
On 03-Dec-98 Joey Hess wrote:
> Oscar Levi wrote:
>> Thus, the first question is whether or not we believe the DFSG needs
>> to be changed.
>
> Well I can agree with that!
>
> Could we put this to a vote?
>
> --
> see shy jo
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------*
* Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ *
* <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ *
* -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------*
=========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNmc/5Lbps1lIfUYBAQF0tQP+NlPlcmvuxR4xzjd4+bEDHPvyRvcsU2CS
Qo262XR+jsiXTqzyEOIplEL3+4pQ38fdbXYaQpcqJjUUJF1Xdlp4Pa+3mEyiBsiv
jGANycQ4MeI3/943Dqz2iJQ8doS+EXO4xopb92V6IBENj5kv6b1DeGNoqluXKuMS
FFU4DQ5tUoc=
=EQ61
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: