On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 12:56:23AM +0000, James Troup wrote: > [1] The advertising clause is carefully worded so as not to designate > all BSD software as non-free; IWJ is not stupid, he's not going to > make GNU libc non-free. It affects software where the copyright > holder(s) is(/are) actively making new releases _and_ making a > conscious choice to retain the offensive advertising clause. Of course, you've said yourself you won't miss Apache. It's too bad the rest of the world would miss it. Or we could just hope our attempt at license terrorism would cause them to change just for us. (I still will vote no on anything that resembles the dfsg2.) -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpm6CLLKwmFh.pgp
Description: PGP signature