Re: lpr version numbering
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:13:40PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Adam J. Klein wrote:
> > I know I can use an epoch to make sure it's upgraded, but this is such a
> > drastic change I thought I'd ask for some second opinions.
>
> I wonder how our version-number got that high considering it is probably
> based on the same sources as the RH package. I'ld say an epoch is a
> good solution to get the versions back in sync.
There is no version number obviously evident in the lpr source tree. Red
Hat probably noticed this and so started at 0.1. The Debian package, on
the other hand uses the RCS version number found in lpr.c, 5.9.
Adam Klein
Reply to: