Re: STANDARD SOFTWARE COMPATABILITY
On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 06:46:55PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I know of a Brilliant alternative to lightwave, by the name of "Blender",
> > > > > (http://www.blender.nl/) If it had a better license, I would package it.
> > > Not likely, The next version is to be commercial.. (I think thats right,
> > > maybe my wires are crossed.. I'll check)
> >
> > No it's not, but I'll need to contact the author(s).
> >
> >
> > Copyright and comments follow.
> >
> >
> > Permission to copy and distribute this software and its
> > documentation without written agreement is hereby granted only for non-
> > commercial purposes.
> >
> > Debian is non-commercial?
>
> Yes, but to be DFSG-free the software has to permit any use. I will have to go
> into non-free.
I thought that would be the case, in fact it has to be, the source is not
available. Yet. 1.5 is supposed to be Free Software.
> > Distributing Blender 'bundled' in with ANY product
> > is considered to be a `commercial purpose'. This entire copyright notice
> > must appear in all copies of this software.
> >
> > This gets me... comments?
>
> I think this will hinder the distribution of blender with Debian at all.
Those were my thoughts.
> > If you would like to do something with this software that this copyright
> > prohibits (such as distributing blender commercially), please contact
> > NaN.
> >
> > Bingo!
>
> If you want to package it - contact them and ask if they would accept the
> bundling with Debian. Of course it has to go into non-free then.
I will contact them, If I get the time!
Michael Beattie (mickyb@es.co.nz)
PGP Key available, reply with "pgpkey" as subject.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WinErr: 006 Malicious error - Desqview found on drive
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux.... Ooohh You are missing out!
Reply to: