Re: Draft new DFSG
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <email@example.com> writes:
Raul> Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I believe the suggested changes to (which is not changes but a
>> complete replacement) DFSG is a dud, completely. I believe trying to
>> adopt it will hurt and quite probably destroy Debian. Here's why: ...
Raul> For what it's worth, I think these points have merit.
As do I I have just read the DFSG2. I am still unsure about
what was said, exactly. I shall go and read it again. I never had
that problem with the DFSG. Replacing a clear startement of what is
free with legal-looking gobledygook is a really bad idea.
I agree that the DFSG may have been unclear at
points. Obfuscating the document is unlikely to help.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E