libc6 2.07u vs. MTAs
On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
: On 23 Nov 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
: > >>>>> "Jaldhar" == Jaldhar H Vyas <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
: > Jaldhar> Hold on a minute. doing a dpkg -l libc6 on master gives
: > Jaldhar> 2.07u. Shouldn't that be 2.07t? I don't think master is
: > Jaldhar> hamm anymore.
: > Who did this? If this is so, master is pretty much useless for building
: > packages..
: I don't know, but I'm very upset about it and have just undone it. For the
: record this also royally messed up qmail. Let me know if anything else is
: non-hamm, also try va.debian.org.
Does 2.07u screw up the other MTAs also? I've had some weird
exim/sendmail interaction but was able to work around it, to some
If 2.07u DOES mess with MTAs then I will sleep much better tonight :)
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
finger email@example.com for PGP Key: (0xA33B86E9)