On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 02:58:41PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > As I've said before, most recently in a posting to -private, and > before that in various fora, I think the DFSG has some serious > problems due to loose wording. I also strongly dislike the patch > clause. [..] Ian, your timing sucks. => Not that I don't agree with you. On the whole, it's very long and wordy to say just a few things. I can understand the need to do that, but. Things like allowing reverse- engineering seem pointless to me actually since there would already be source. The DFSG should be easy to figure out, the licenses are what should require interpretting. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpJ12t9sshAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature