Hi Sven! On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 01:56:40PM +0100, luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr wrote: > since ocaml (and i suppose caml-light also) have a license that is almost > debian-friendly, the only problem is that they don't allow for binary > distribution of modified work, and thus it is not really possible to make > debian package out of it (altough the authors don't consider debianizing as a > modification of the work). What is the license of Moscow ML ? since it is a > derivative, it should be similar to ocaml. It uses the CAML-Light license. I did not find that binary distribution is not allowed... Perhaps ocaml "enhanced" the copyright somewhat? I will look through the copyright again. > beside that ocaml is a ML dialect that has decided to continue to evolve when > the SML standard was set, and thus is a bit more evolued. I guess you are right but Moscow ML is easier to start with. cu Torsten
Attachment:
pgptE7guc8LAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature