[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should LPR be the standard printer daemon?

On Thu, Nov 19, 1998 at 07:09:18PM -0800, Adam J. Klein wrote:
> 	This message follows up on the previous LPR thread.  Until I get a
> reasonably maintainable and definately secure version of LPR int the
> distributions, why don't we make LPRng the standard lpd, and move LPR to
> optional or extra?  One problem might be, and since I don't use lprng, I
> don't know much about it, is the complexity of configuring LPRng.  Is it
> harder for a newbie to set it up than to set up lpr?  Comments, please.

I just set it up on 2 machines in about 20 minutes. I have never used lpr
or lprng before. So it isn't really too bad, altho I havent looked into
the security yet.

> 	Adam Klein
> 	lpr maintainer
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Robbie Murray

Reply to: