Re: Should LPR be the standard printer daemon?
On Thu, Nov 19, 1998 at 07:09:18PM -0800, Adam J. Klein wrote:
> This message follows up on the previous LPR thread. Until I get a
> reasonably maintainable and definately secure version of LPR int the
> distributions, why don't we make LPRng the standard lpd, and move LPR to
> optional or extra? One problem might be, and since I don't use lprng, I
> don't know much about it, is the complexity of configuring LPRng. Is it
> harder for a newbie to set it up than to set up lpr? Comments, please.
I just set it up on 2 machines in about 20 minutes. I have never used lpr
or lprng before. So it isn't really too bad, altho I havent looked into
the security yet.
> Adam Klein
> lpr maintainer
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org