Bruce Perens wrote: > > I think we could clarify the DFSG/OSD a bit more in regards to this. > > We haven't had this situation before, so it's a bit odd. > > Is this the first application of the patch exception? I suggested it for > qmail, but qmail had other problems. Someone mentioned that it may be used > for TeX, but I have not checked. No, we've actually used the patch excemption before. Jim was referring to the seperate patch licence. -- see shy jo