[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Qt Freed!

--On Thu, Nov 19, 1998 5:19 pm +0000 "David Damerell"
<damerell@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: 

> jim@jimpick.com:
>>(Of course, I have doubts whether or not it is compatible with the GPL
>>- but that's a moot point if the KDE guys change their license as
> Qt not freed. It's not compatible with the DFSG/ Open Source Definition,
> and the Open Source people may well be pissy about the misuse of their
> trademark. It looks like an attempt to placate us without actually
> preventing Troll Tech from charging commercial application developers,
> which has, IMAO, been their aim all along.
> It might be good enough to get Qt into nonfree and KDE into contrib,
> though.

Since the consensus here is that it *is* DFSG compliance, would you like to
point as at the conflict?


|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd        |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem -     |
|                      and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC)           |

Reply to: