[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Qt license change



On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 11:25:59AM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> > Yes.  One nit:
> > 
> > Paragraph 3b appears to essentially put patches in the public domain.  I
> > assume that what they intend is that they be put under the QPL.
> 
> Hah.  Don't be fooled.
> 
> They want to be able to relicense your patches for the commercial Qt.  This
> isn't such a bad thing to want, and I don't think it conflicts with the
> DFSG.  (If they didn't require this, commercial Qt would soon fall way
> behind the free one -- then Troll Tech has a problem.)

The NPL has a similar bit of wording..

-- 
Show me the code or get out of my way.

Attachment: pgpt9g3NbIMjz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: