On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 08:24:23AM -0600, john@dhh.gt.org wrote: > Joseph Carter writes: > > I've spent the past 30 minutes doing JUST THAT. Not only is it DFSG free, > > it looks like it is 100% compatible with the GPL! If not completely in > > terms of the words, it is in the spirit and the words are merely a draft. > > Yes. One nit: > > Paragraph 3b appears to essentially put patches in the public domain. I > assume that what they intend is that they be put under the QPL. The other nit seems to be that 3a might conflict, which I had not considered a problem. I'm not certain it IS a problem yet though. 3b is not QUITE PD, the copyright notices and all, but it might be a question to ask them.. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpw7BcI28vNE.pgp
Description: PGP signature