On Mon, Nov 16, 1998 at 12:17:09PM -0600, john@dhh.gt.org wrote: > > Granted, if someone tried to prosicute in such a case the owners of the > > router... > > They wouldn't be prosecuted. A criminal conviction requires proof of > intent, and the router owners could easily show that they knew nothing > James' activities. Besides, such a prosecution would do nothing to advance > the cause of crypto suppression. The crypto kooks are not really the fools > they often seem. It would do NOTHING the help further crypto supression. It would cause EVERY SINGLE BACKBONE located in the US to get really annoyed with the US gov't fast over these stupid and pointless restrictions. Needless to say, I'd pay see that. => -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Attachment:
pgpQ5ZdG7Myay.pgp
Description: PGP signature