Re: libgtk1.1

To: Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgtk1.1
From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Date: 10 Nov 1998 22:45:42 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] yttlnlig221.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu>
In-reply-to: Michael Meskes's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 1998 21:40:29 +0100"
References: <[🔎] 412566B7.00446C6D.00@NTSNOTES0010019.WestLB.de> <[🔎] ytt7lx41syd.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu> <[🔎] 19981110134901.C433@usa.net> <[🔎] yttiugn4b3s.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu> <[🔎] 19981110214029.A1531@usa.net>

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net> writes:

    Ben> For now, feel free to file bugs on anything that's not
    Ben> compiled against gtk+ 1.1.3.

    Michael> That's a way to go. But I would have to file a bug
    Michael> against my own gxedit package without seeing a way to
    Michael> recompile it. Did the API change a lot?

I frankly don't know :) I just know it's not binary compatible..
from now on the shlibs file will be =version, not >= version.

-- 
Brought to you by the letters J and V and the number 3.
"My sister has three.. gender biases." -- Moxy Fruvous
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.

Reply to:

References:
- libgtk1.1
  - From: mummert&partner_meskesm@WestLB.de
- Re: libgtk1.1
  - From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
- Re: libgtk1.1
  - From: Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>
- Re: libgtk1.1
  - From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
- Re: libgtk1.1
  - From: Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Release-critical Bug Report for November 7
Next by Date: Re: checking for /tmp security holes
Previous by thread: Re: libgtk1.1
Next by thread: Re: libgtk1.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread