warp@whitestar.soark.net wrote: > > [snip] > > *winces* Perhaps it would help to list what all has to be done for one > new maintainer application to be processed along with the instructions > on how to submit said applications, it can help at times to know how > much work really has to be done.. (=:] > [snip] I agree about having clearer guidelines about how to submit applications. I sent jpg attachments of identification papers in my email. I am not sure it I should have or not (~700K). I heard an earlier respondant mentioning his telephone charges. Maybe I should have just sent the application with no attachments and provided a place for the jpgs to be downloaded? Who knows? I don't. I would have felt better if I could have at least received a reply just to tell me that the email had been received. Even an autoresponder would be nice. But now I'm wondering if it didn't get caught in a spam filter or something. I certainly don't want to spam the devel list with questions of: "Did you get it? Did you get it?". And I don't want to re-send my application and furthur bog down an already slow process. -Mitch BTW - Did you get it? -- This .sig space available for lease. Please contact: Mitch Blevins | mitch_blevins@mindspring.com
Attachment:
pgpP64Yr6X5kA.pgp
Description: PGP signature