Re: /USR/BIN/CRON

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: /USR/BIN/CRON
From: john@dhh.gt.org
Date: 26 Oct 1998 14:13:08 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k91ncca3.fsf@hasler.dhh>
In-reply-to: Santiago Vila's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:27:44 +0100 (CET)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981026182215.27453A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

I wrote:
> While I admit it is peculiar, I see no reason why this should be against
> policy.   There may even be scripts out there that depend on this.

Santiago Vila writes:
> Since Debian is free and comes with source code, we will obviosuly be able
> to change whatever scripts are broken due to cron's own brokenness.

They may not be Debian scripts.

I just made a brief search of my archive of ancient Unix books, but found
no reason for this upcasing thing.  Look in the source?
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

References:
- Re: /USR/BIN/CRON
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Lawyers needed: Zanshin Public License
Next by Date: Re: /USR/BIN/CRON
Previous by thread: Re: /USR/BIN/CRON
Next by thread: Re: /USR/BIN/CRON
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread