Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Am I the only one who considers this thread FUD?
If encryption hooks were illegal, then what's the mailcrypt package
(PGP interface for Emacs) doing on mit.edu?
Please, don't put mutt-i in non-us (not for the reasons stated...).
Or we'd soon have all of Linux in non-us: it can call encryption
software. Come to think of it: is the GNU mp lib on ftp.gnu.org? It
is (if I'm not mistaken) one of the things you'll need for RSA
etc... and given that some people sued the company that makes the
fertilizer used in the Oklahoma City Bombing... (was that successful?)
Bye, J
- --
Jürgen A. Erhard eMail: jae@laden.ilk.de phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326
My WebHome: http://members.tripod.com/~Juergen_Erhard
Linux - Free PC Unix (http://www.linux.org)
"Windows NT" is an acronym for "Windows? No thanks." -- Russ McManus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQEVAwUBNiwFgAIG66LugGzRAQHC5wf/R0b9UeWXhir6bWhRhhlNhFcxi/ScMVxG
QujI/uVftVyC+e8ct9aAjTQepOI6XGj5kOe5t0XUtJ58WnCDm60alcrur8Xhtk0Y
65hy6JOyrj1NmerWFD+FV/u0TvLQ4PQLGCUmY/ZSWmq3+pmuZ6shhI+CTd5oW1Od
V4PEucKqTV2FrTjMvywYmtJCBOPfUhYdBki6ea2hMIrsYbHv9jXJshYF1hmqFdbj
HUo9uXTjd3QmfaCNUXNkKyK6OjeBjxTs1dk0JHnfTyhc7C1g3pPkoSSXK71KBR7H
8r7j15Q4Zkhc3ygSlseFy8yJf+a8QzAArkgQNr5BgDNORTU14uX2WA==WQCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: