Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?

To: "Gregory S. Stark" <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth@job.cs.brandeis.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aland@cs.cs.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:36:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981018123637.D454@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ycqd87qkwxw.fsf@mit.edu>; from Gregory S. Stark on Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 06:04:43AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 19981015105045.C3882@cs.brandeis.edu> <[🔎] 19981016002324.I7355@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] ycqd87qkwxw.fsf@mit.edu>

Gregory S. Stark wrote:
> > You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb
> 
> Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem.

Yes.  That was the intention - which failed again.  *sigh*

Could you try the next prelimnary version?

ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Let's call it an accidental feature.  --Larry Wall

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: Stephen Crowley <crow@debian.org>

References:
- Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth@job.cs.brandeis.edu>
- Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark)

Prev by Date: Netscape packages and lesstif
Next by Date: Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master
Previous by thread: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
Next by thread: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread