Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?

To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
Cc: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth@job.cs.brandeis.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, aland@cs.cs.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
From: gsstark@mit.edu (Gregory S. Stark)
Date: 18 Oct 1998 06:04:43 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] ycqd87qkwxw.fsf@mit.edu>
In-reply-to: Martin Schulze's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 1998 00:23:24 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 19981015105045.C3882@cs.brandeis.edu> <[🔎] 19981016002324.I7355@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
> 
> You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed:
> 
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb

Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem.

greg

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

References:
- Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth@job.cs.brandeis.edu>
- Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

Prev by Date: Re: (WARNING) xfree86 3.3.2.3a-2 (source all i386) uploaded to master
Next by Date: Netscape packages and lesstif
Previous by thread: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
Next by thread: Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread