[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what's after slink



*-kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
|
| > - Another naming scheme without any background would be A, B, C...
| >   There where programming languages doing this for only three
| >   stages to get *very* popular...
| 
| Nope. That wasn't the sequence that led to C. I won't swear to it, but I  
| seem to remember the predecessor of C was BCPL.

CPL -> BCPL -> B -> C

B was never widely published or used, so many don't count it. I don't
think there ever was an A.

-- 
...Unix, MS-DOS, and MS Windows (also known as the Good, the Bad,
and the Ugly).                                       (Matt Welsh)
olet@ifi.uio.no   [-: .elOle. :-]   olet@debian.org


Reply to: