Re: LICENSES [was: Re: Have you seen this?]
On 10 Oct 1998, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > All this is just splitting hairs, though. The real question is "what
> > is KDE's problem with just adding that additional permission to their
> > license"? How does it hurt them to do that?
>
> Is that really not obvious to you?
Craig Sanders and some debian people wanted to play simple tricks ;-)
Yours,
-- martin
P.S.: Please move that discussion away from kde@kde.org! Thank you!!
// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany //
// Email: konold@kde.org //
Anybody who's comfortable using KDE should use it. Anyone who wants to
tell other people what they should be using can go to work for Microsoft.
John.Giasi@ummed.edu: "BCPL gave birth to B, and the child of B was of
course C, since the ancestor of X is W, so the
sucessor to X must be K."
Reply to: