Re: The freeze and IMMINENT 2.2.0p1!!
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 03:05:17PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> No, this would hold the release for at least two more months.
Joey, that's exaggerated by a lot. But I agree with your reasoning-
> . We have several kernel module package that need to be re-packaged.
> . We have to rework on the sound modules, possibly, I dunno.
We won't have to if we provide both kernels. We just would also add two
packages for those modules compiled for both.
> . We have to rework on the boot-floppies to cope with different
> and/or more modules etc.
Not needed under my approach.
> . We have to ensure that the new kernel headers won't infect
> various compilation of programs.
Shouldn't be much of a problem.
> . We might need to re-compile/re-package the libc.
No.
> . We need to include new programs / packages to interfere with
> new kernel interfaces.
Don't we have them already?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant | business: Michael.Meskes@mummert.de | Go Rhein Fire!
Mummert+Partner | private: Michael.Meskes@usa.net | Use Debian
Unternehmensberatung AG | Michael.Meskes@gmx.net | GNU/Linux!
Reply to: