Re: Dependency strangeness (dpkg bug?)
Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com> writes:
> >>>>> "John" == John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> writes:
> John> I know one can't do versioned provides. I thought that dpkg
> John> was simply supposed to ignore the version when dealing with
> John> something that provides an item that is depended upon?
>
> It is my intent to engage in "bug terrorism" :) against all packages
> currently depending on jdk1.1-runtime in the near future.
Go for it!
With slink freeze looming only 2 weeks down the road, we must get
these things fixed ASAP.
--
John Goerzen Linux, Unix consulting & programming jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade) www.debian.org |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Visit the Air Capital Linux Users Group on the web at http://www.aclug.org
Reply to: