Re: /usr/local in some packages
Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 1998 at 12:16:52PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > After purging emacs today, the damn thing deleted my /usr/local symlink since
> > it was the last package to have /usr/local in it. Obviously this is not very
> > clever.
> > So we should either remove /usr/local from all packages, or tell dpkg to not
> > remove /usr/local. I personally favour the former solution.
> /usr/local should not be used in packages. Thought that was already policy?
Right. No package may install stuff in /usr/local nor in /opt. Period.
I guess the only exceptions are perl and emacs where the package
should create the directory structure so people won't have to
Never trust an operating system you don't have source for!