Re: Intent to package: ippfvsadm
On Sat, Sep 12, 1998 at 08:51:20PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> In the new 2.0.36pre Linux kernels, there are some changes that prevent the
> ipportfw package from working anymore.
Why is it that kernel changes (which are fair enough) prompt the
creation from scratch of new administration programs?
Why did the changes in Linux 2.1 require ipchains to be written,
instead of ipfwadm just updated? Why this new program instead of
Gratuitous package name changes are problematic.
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org