Re: Are we going with X_LOCALE or not?
I don't know why X_LOCALE has been finally defined. It just
appeared as a *bug fix*.
About the status of i18n in libc6, I know the current
released version of libc6 (or glibc2) only supports
single-byte charsets and UTF-8 unicode, and some work is in
progress for some future version. In addition, there is
another i18n implementation by a leading member of Debian JP
group that is being tested publicly.
I think it is nice for Debian to keep compatibility with
others, too. But I also understand some users want i18n in
X today. It may be necessary to hurry.
>>>>> On 11 Sep 1998 00:09:50 -0400, Steve Dunham <email@example.com> said:
SD> In particular, this breaks compatibility with other distributions.
SD> What exactly is the story here? I thought locale was supposed to be
SD> fixed in libc6?
SD> If the problem is just with asian locales, can libc6 be fixed? It
SD> really would be nice to have compatibility between distributions.
Kaz Sasayama <Kaz.Sasayama@hypercore.co.jp>
Hypercore Software Design, Ltd. <URL:http://www.hypercore.co.jp/>