[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Not only KDE



> On Wed, Sep 09, 1998 at 02:53:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 	Nope. We may have the right to distribute a package under the
> >  GPL as long as the author has goven explicit permission to be able to
> >  distribute the package even when linked with xforms. No problem there
> >  -- as long as the permission is give.
> 
> I see. That is our LyX package just needs such a statement. And since it
> didn't incorporate other GPLed stuff that shouldn't be an issue. But the KDE
> version klyx still isn't allowed to be distributed, right?

Well, if you have a statement from the LyX author saying it's OK to link it 
against Qt, and a statement from the KDE patch author that it's OK to link 
their bit against Qt, then you are OK AFAIKS, otherwise the LyX GPL rules out 
linking it against Qt and distributing the result.

Cheers, Phil


Reply to: