Re: Intent to package runas...
On Tue, Sep 08, 1998 at 08:26:05AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, Philippe Troin wrote:
> : Michael Bramer wrote:
> : > Hello
> : >
> : > From the Readme:
> : > # Runas is a program that allows the super-user to run a program as if
> : > # an ordinary user ran it. There are two main uses for runas, and both relate
> : > # to security.
> : > #
> : > # One is to allow the super-user to execute a binary given by an
> : > # un-trusted user. Suppose the program is /usr/smith/program. The super-user
> : > # simply creates a dummy account, say one called 'nobody' which doesn't have
> : > # sufficient privileges to do any harm (the account needn't have login
> : > # capability). The super-user can then do:
> : > #
> : > # 'runas nobody /usr/smith/program'
> : Out of my head, this is a runas clone:
> : #!/bin/sh
> : user=$1
> : shift
> : exec su -c "'$@'" $user
> Or, `sudo -u user "command"'
or to make it even more of a clone...
alias runas='sudo -u'
Still though...I don't see any reason NOT to have runas as a package...
just gives us more choices :) ..not everyone likes having sudo installed...or
Someone thought it was a big enough need to write runas :)
/* -- Stephen Carpenter <firstname.lastname@example.org> --- <email@example.com>------------ */
E-mail "Bumper Stickers":
"A FREE America or a Drug-Free America: You can't have both!"
"honk if you Love Linux"